Written by Ryan Jones. Updated on 02, November 2023
In the extraordinarily vast and ever-changing world of SEO, understanding the nuances between correlation and causation, especially regarding a business' SEO testing strategy, is paramount.
These terms seem straightforward, but they can easily be misinterpreted in various states of data analysis.
What exactly do they mean in the context of SEO and SEO testing? And why is it so vital to know the differences between them? This article aims to answer both of those questions.
Mistaking correlation for causation can lead to conclusions that are, essentially, wrong. This results in actions and decisions that are misguided. When you focus solely on correlational relationships, there is massive potential for you to overlook the underlying causes of changes. This leads to wasted resources, inefficiencies of different levels and even harmful outcomes. This confusion can also reinforce existing biases, create misconceptions, and, over time, erode your credibility.
These mistakes can compoint. This is when one flawed conclusion leads to a series of misguided decisions based on the initial error. It's crucial to approach correlational data critically. This will ensure you have a good understanding, can make effective decisions and avoid all the pitfalls of misinterpretation.
At the heart of many mistakes within SEO, SEO strategies, and SEO testing in general is an often simple error... Confusing correlation and causation.
Let's say, for example, that you have just changed your website's design and almost immediately see a spike in traffic coming to your site. It's, of course, tempting to think that the design change caused the spike in traffic. But what if, at the same time, one of your products was featured in a popular online magazine? There's an argument that this feature could have caused that spike in traffic, especially if it's direct traffic combined with increased organic search traffic.
If you mistake correlation for causation, you can make essential mistakes within your more comprehensive SEO strategy.
If a website sees a traffic increase after updating its title tags, it will be easy to attribute the traffic boost to this change. But external factors, such as a social media post that has gone viral or a recent mention in the press, could be the actual cause! Making errors like this can often result in wasted resources, misaligned strategies, and lost SEO opportunities in general.
When it comes to SEO testing, correlation shows that there is a relationship between two variables. For example, there might be a correlation between certain keywords and higher page rankings. But does this mean that using those keywords in your content will always lead to better rankings? Not at all.
Correlation does not imply causation. It's simply observing that two variables move together. But this, of course, does not mean that one variable is causing the other to move. It's essential to approach such observations with a pinch of salt and not jump to quick conclusions.
Causation refers to a direct, cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. This means when one variable directly influences or creates a change in another variable. There's a relationship between them! Establishing causation means proving that a specific factor or action directly impacts a particular outcome, such as search engine rankings or your website traffic.
When identifying causation, you can think of causation as the big player in the game. It suggests that a change in one variable is responsible for a change in another.
For SEO professionals, proving a causal link between something you have done and a positive SEO result can be a game-changer for optimising strategies, getting buy-in for more SEO projects, and improving your standing with peers and superiors.
To determine causation, you need to dive deeper. Linking this to SEO testing, you should consider conducting controlled experiments where only one variable is changed at a time. This approach can help validate if a specific change (such as adding a video to a page) directly impacts your desired outcome (increased page dwell time, for example).
Luckily, there are some things that you can do to avoid mistaking correlation for causation. In this section, we'll talk through those things in detail.
When you look closely at data, you can better understand how different variables are connected. This will help ensure that you are not just seeing things happen simultaneously, without one causing the other. By checking the data differently, you can be more sure of what is happening beneath the surface!
When we relate this to the lens of SEO, careful checking and analysis is important. Many things can change how a website ranks in search results. By studying the data, you can figure out what changes make a difference and what changes do not make a difference.
Using critical thinking when examining SEO test data will mean that you are not just taking things at face value. Instead, you are questioning, analysing, and digging deeper into the results. This helps you spot patterns that might be misleading.
For example, just because two events happen together does not mean one event caused the other. Just because your rankings went up when you changed the content on your page, it doesn't necessarily mean that the content change was the cause. By thinking critically, you can identify other factors influencing the results, ensuring you don't jump to conclusions based on mere coincidences.
This approach is vital in SEO testing. SEO involves many variables, from content quality to site speed and backlinks. If you don't think critically about test results, you might attribute a ranking change to the wrong factor. You can make more accurate interpretations by being cautious, analytical, and the like.
All of this leads to better-informed strategies.
Controlled SEO tests involve changing one specific element of your website whilst keeping everything else constant! This approach allows you to directly see the impact of that single change on your results. When you separate variables in this manner, you can more confidently attribute any changes in rankings or traffic to the specific element you adjusted rather than to external factors or coincidences.
To put it another way, controlled experiments mean you are more likely to find causal changes than correlational ones.
Without controlled tests, you're navigating a sea of potentially thousands of variables, any of which could be influencing your results. For instance, a spike in traffic might coincide with a content update, but it could also be due to an external event or a change in search algorithms. Especially if you have also been changing other things on your website simultaneously. Controlled tests help eliminate as many variables as possible, ensuring conclusions are drawn based on cause-and-effect relationships.
Ensuring you stay up-to-date with SEO and the latest trends ensures you are aware of the ever-evolving factors and algorithms used by search engines. This knowledge helps you interpret test results within the context of the current SEO landscape.
For example. If you are unaware of a recent algorithm update that emphasises mobile optimisation, you might mistakenly attribute a drop in mobile traffic to a recent site design change rather than the algorithm change.
Being informed about the latest SEO trends allows you to design relevant and timely tests. It prevents you from drawing conclusions based on outdated practices or factors that no longer hold as much weight as they did. When you stay updated well, you can better find the distinctions between genuine cause-and-effect relationships and purely coincidental relationships within your SEO testing results.
To avoid mistaking correlation for causation in your SEO test results, you must conduct controlled tests where you only change one element at a time, allowing you to isolate its direct impact.
Always use critical thinking when examining results; don't just accept them at face value but question and analyse them as profoundly as possible.
Ensure you're staying up to date on the latest SEO trends, and also ensure that you understand any recent algorithm updates and how these may have impacted your results.
Collaborating with SEO professionals may provide valuable insights and help validate your findings!
Misinterpreting correlation as causation in SEO testing has the potential to lead to misguided strategies and a lot of wasted resources.
When a specific change, for example, an updated meta description, also coincides with a rise in rankings, assuming the change directly caused the improvement can result in focussing on ineffective tasks whilst potentially neglecting changes that will be more impactful.
This can hamper a website's performance in search engine results, leading to missed opportunities, a misallocated budget and a skewed understanding of what drives organic visibility and traffic.
In the intricate realm of SEO testing, distinguishing between correlation and causation is crucial to finding accurate insights and forming effective strategies. Misinterpreting these can lead to misguided decisions, wasted efforts and plenty of missed opportunities. By employing controlled experiments, staying updated with SEO trends, and embracing a critical approach to data analysis, SEO professionals can navigate the complexities of SEO testing more adeptly and ensure their strategies are grounded in genuine causal relationships. Not coincidences.
Want to take your SEO testing to the next level? SEOTesting may just be the tool for you. You can use it on any platform, as it directly integrates with Google Search Console and will allow you to find those cause-and-effect changes to improve your traffic significantly. We are currently running a 14-day free trial, so sign up here.